What is the acceptable amount of leak down when vacuum testing the stock brake booster? I mityvac'd down to 20"hg and it dropped to 5"hg in exactly 6 minutes.
The pedal seems to drop some normal amount when 18" vacuum is applied. Video: https://photos.app.goo.gl/xQP742XBxfWRNEGUA
Acceptable booster leak down '64
Moderator: Dan Szwarc
-
- Occasional Visitor
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 1:01 am
- Location: Austin, TX
- Contact:
- action
- LCOC Regional Director
- Posts: 5221
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 1:01 am
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona 85008
- Contact:
Re: Acceptable booster leak down '64
I have never seen a spec for what you are asking.
And there may be one.
The spec you are asking about would be testing the check valve
Six minutes is a very long time if the engine was off and the booster stall had a vacuum signal
The only spec I have heard of if you are driving and the engine stalls out there should be enough boost for a couple braking applications.
Action
And there may be one.
The spec you are asking about would be testing the check valve
Six minutes is a very long time if the engine was off and the booster stall had a vacuum signal
The only spec I have heard of if you are driving and the engine stalls out there should be enough boost for a couple braking applications.
Action
Phoenix - Yeah, it's hot, however it's a dry heat
2006 Lincoln Navigator Limited 5.4l 3V
1996 Lincoln Mark VIII 2DR Coupe Diamond Anniversary 4.6l DOHC, 4R70W, 3.07
1970 Continental Mark III Triple Black 460 4v, C6, 2.80 (Used for Woodward Dream Cruise or just generally stored in Michigan)
1966 Lincoln Continental 4DR Convertible 462 4v, C6, 3.00
1966 Mercury Park Lane 4DR Breezeway 410 4v, C6, 2.80
2006 Lincoln Navigator Limited 5.4l 3V
1996 Lincoln Mark VIII 2DR Coupe Diamond Anniversary 4.6l DOHC, 4R70W, 3.07
1970 Continental Mark III Triple Black 460 4v, C6, 2.80 (Used for Woodward Dream Cruise or just generally stored in Michigan)
1966 Lincoln Continental 4DR Convertible 462 4v, C6, 3.00
1966 Mercury Park Lane 4DR Breezeway 410 4v, C6, 2.80
-
- Occasional Visitor
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 1:01 am
- Location: Austin, TX
- Contact:
Re: Acceptable booster leak down '64
Alright. I should note that the leak down test as I performed it did not include the T check valve.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest